SAN FRANCISCO (AP) Jurors have ended their fifth day of deliberations with out reaching a verdict within the homicide trial that sparked a nationwide debate over immigration coverage.
Authorized specialists stated Wednesday that deliberations are taking longer than ordinary for a typical homicide trial. They notice that the case is difficult by the defendant’s declare that the gun that killed Kate Steinle fired by accident.
Jurors are deciding whether or not Jose Ines Garcia Zarate meant to shoot Steinle in 2015 or in the event that they consider his declare that the the capturing was unintentional.
Longtime San Francisco Bay Space protection lawyer Dan Horowitz says jurors could also be struggling to discover a compromise verdict in need of homicide.
College of California, Berkeley regulation professor Andrea Roth says the prolonged deliberations might imply the jurors are divided.
Jurors resume deliberating Thursday.